Bridgewater Daily Observations
09/13/2011
Bridgewater Associates, LP
European Plans
As explained, there are three ways for the Europeans to deal with the funding gaps:
1) Transfer wealth from the "haves" to the debtors
2) Print money
3) Restructure the debt
There are also three types of plans that can be followed to set the mix of these things:
1. Plan A is the path that policy makers were on up until now and that they might still be on. It is the
one in which they a) collect whatever money that can be gathered from the "wealthy" countries
that have enough to "lend" to the debtor countries, b) get the ECB to do all the lending and bond
buying it is willing to do and c) hope that private sector investors will make up the difference so
that there won't be defaults. This was the plan that policy makers were so confident would work
that they did not make a good Plan B (i.e., a plan that would make everything OK in the event that
it didn't work). As it turned out the gap that policy makers (mostly the EFSF and ECB) had to fill
over the last year was over €400bn and the amount that they have left to fill the gap that is to
come is small, so it is now pretty clear that this plan is not working, so they need to put together a
good Plan B fast.
2. Plan B(1) is a plan to save the system without saving everyone from debt restructuring by a)
having each government take care of its own banks and key others and b) using EFSF funds to
protect those that are both systemically most important (e.g., banks via helping with
recapitalizations) and don't have governments that are capable of protecting them. We believe
that once stressed governments are motivated to take care of themselves, most will become
adequately resourceful (e.g., sell assets and structure deals) and that, while this plan is a bit
riskier than Plan B(2) over the short term, it is much safer over the long term. We previously
showed the numbers to convey why we believe that this plan can work and explained why we
believe that insolvent governments can go through restructurings without sinking the system and
without even sinking the euro.
3. Plan B(2) is a plan to save most everyone by leveraging up the EFSF and other government
money. For example, by recapitalizing the banks and having the ECB provide them with liquidity,
a lot of leverage can be created (because that's what banks do) in order to buy a lot of sovereign
bonds and other forms of credit. While some people ask how to get the money to recapitalize the
banks, that's the easy part (by using EFSF funds, selling off assets or borrowing against them,
changing the banks' capital structures, etc.).
While we believe that we will ultimately see a mix of the two Plan Bs come about, we believe that it
will look more like Plan B(2) than Plan B(1) because a) some types of lending and providing of
guarantees are conveniently not clearly wealth transfers, printing or write-downs, and b) policy
makers tend to favor short-term rewards at the expense of long-term consequences.
John Broussard
Assistant State Treasurer
Chief Investment Officer
State of Louisiana
Department of the Treasury
Ph: 225-342-0013
Fx: 225-342-9721
Email: jbroussard@treasusry.state.la.us
Street Address:
445 North Blvd, 7th Floor
Baton Rouge, LA 70802
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 44154 Capitol Station
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-4154
Physical Location:
One City Plaza, 7th Floor
Corner of North Blvd & 4th Street
Exit 1B I-110 Convention Street, Turn Left to get to North Blvd
No comments:
Post a Comment